Diz Osteoartriti Olan Hastalarda Kısa Dalga Diaterminin Genotoksik Etkisinin Araştırılması
PDF
Atıf
Paylaş
Talep
P: 53-57
Ağustos 2019

Diz Osteoartriti Olan Hastalarda Kısa Dalga Diaterminin Genotoksik Etkisinin Araştırılması

Turk J Osteoporos 2019;25(2):53-57
Bilgi mevcut değil.
Bilgi mevcut değil
Alındığı Tarih: 24.02.2019
Kabul Tarihi: 30.04.2019
Yayın Tarihi: 12.07.2019
PDF
Atıf
Paylaş
Talep

ÖZET

Amaç:

Kısa dalga diatermi (KDD), fiziksel tıp uygulamalarında genellikle derin ısıtıcı olarak kullanılan bir fizik tedavi ajanıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, terapötik KDD’den kaynaklanan bir kromozomal hasar olup olmadığını mikronükleus (MN) yöntemiyle araştırmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntem:

Çalışmaya diz ağrısı olan ve Amerikan Romatoloji Koleji kriterleri ile gonartroz tanısı alan 30 hasta dahil edildi. Yirmi hasta tedavi grubu (grup 1), 10 hasta kontrol grubu (grup 2) olarak tayin edildi. Tedavi grubundaki hastalara 10 seans KDD tedavisi uygulandı, kontrol grubundaki hastalara ise 10 seans sahte KDD tedavisi uygulandı. MN skorlarını değerlendirmek için periferik venöz kan, hem tedavi hem de kontrol grubundan 10 seans KDD tedavisi uygulaması öncesi ve sonrasında alındı. Tedavi öncesi değerlendirilen MN skorları, tedavi grubunda ve kontrol gruplarında 10 seans KDD tedavisi sonu MN skorları ile karşılaştırıldı. Tedavi öncesi ve 10 seans KDD tedavi sonrası MN skorları tedavi ve kontrol grubu arasında karşılaştırıldı.

Bulgular:

Her iki grubun KDD tedavisi öncesi ile 10 seans KDD tedavisi sonrasında MN skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p>0,05). Grupların MN skorları karşılaştırıldığında KDD tedavisi öncesi ve 10 seans KDD tedavisi sonrasında MN skorları açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p>0,05).

Sonuç:

Bu çalışmada, terapötik KDD’nin, sitogenetik hasarın bir işareti olan MN skorunda artışa neden olmadığını gözlemledik.

References

1
Wang H, Zhang C, Gao C, Zhu S, Yang L, Wei Q, et al. Effects of short-wave therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2017;31:660-71.
2
Zeng C, Gao SG, Lei GH. Comment on Laufer et al. entitled “Effectiveness of thermal and athermal short-wave diathermy for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:605-6.
3
Incebiyik S, Boyaci A, Tutoglu A. Short-term effectiveness of short-wave diathermy treatment on pain, clinical symptoms, and hand function in patients with mild or moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2015;28:221-8.
4
Al-Mandeel MM, Watson T. The thermal and nonthermal effects of high and low doses of pulsed short wave therapy (PSWT). Physiother Res Int 2010;15:199-211.
5
Israel M, Zaryabova V, Ivanova M. Electromagnetic field occupational exposure: non-thermal vs. thermal effects. Electromagn Biol Med 2013;32:145-54.
6
Lehman JF, De Lateur BJ. Diathermy and superficial heat, laser and cold therapy. In: Kottle, Lehmann editors. Krusen’s Handbook of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 1990;283-6.
7
Kesari KK, Siddiqui MH, Meena R, Verma HN, Kumar S. Cell phone radiation exposure on brain and associated biological systems. Indian J Exp Biol 2013;51:187-200.
8
Meltz ML. Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation. Bioelectromagnetics 2003;6:196-213.
9
Cardinale F, Bruzzi P, Bolognesi C. Role of micronucleus test in predicting breast cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2012;106:780-90.
10
Fenech M, Denham J, Francis W, Morley A. Micronuclei in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes of cancer patients following fractionated partial-body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Biol 1990;57:373-83.
11
Zacher J, Carl HD, Swoboda B, Backhaus M. Imaging of osteoarthritis of the peripheral joints. Z Rheumatol 2007;66:257-8.
12
Fenech M, Holland N, Chang WP, Zeiger E, Bonassi S. The HUman MicroNucleus Project--An international collaborative study on the use of the micronucleus technique for measuring DNA damage in humans. Mutat Res 1999;428:271-83.
13
Balasem AN, Ali AS. Establishment of dose-response relationships between doses of Cs-137 gamma-rays and frequencies of micronuclei in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutat Res 1991;259:133-8.
14
Fenech M. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique: a detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations. Mutat Res 1993;285:35-44.
15
Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araújo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:1270-85.
16
Luzhna L, Kathiria P, Kovalchuk O. Micronuclei in genotoxicity assessment: from genetics to epigenetics and beyond. Front Genet 2013;4:131.
17
Lau A, Belanger CL, Winn LM. In utero and acute exposure to benzene: investigation of DNA double-strand breaks and DNA recombination in mice. Mutat Res 2009;676:74-82.
18
Iarmarcovai G, Bonassi S, Botta A, Baan RA, Orsière T. Genetic polymorphisms and micronucleus formation: a review of the literature. Mutat Res 2008;658:215-33.
19
Kirsch-Volders M, Plas G, Elhajouji A, Lukamowicz M, Gonzalez L, Vande Loock K, et al. The in vitro MN assay in 2011: origin and fate, biological significance, protocols, high throughput methodologies and toxicological relevance. Arch Toxicol 2011;85:873-99.
20
Ramalho A, Sunjevaric I, Natarajan AT. Use of the frequencies of micronuclei as quantitative indicators of X-ray-induced chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: comparison of two methods. Mutat Res 1988;207:141-6.
21
Zeni O, Romanò M, Perrotta A, Lioi MB, Barbieri R, d’Ambrosio G, et al. Evaluation of genotoxic effects in human peripheral blood leukocytes following an acute in vitro exposure to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;26:258-65.
22
Hansteen IL, Lågeide L, Clausen KO, Haugan V, Svendsen M, Eriksen JG, et al. Cytogenetic effects of 18.0 and 16.5 GHz microwave radiation on human lymphocytes in vitro. Anticancer Res 2009;29:2885-92.
23
Stronati L, Testa A, Moquet J, Edwards A, Cordelli E, Villani P, et al. 935 MHz cellular phone radiation. An in vitro study of genotoxicity in human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol 2006;82:339-46.
24
Zhang M, Lu D, He J, Jin L. Effect of low-intensity microwave of on mitomycin C-induced genotoxicity in vitro. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2002;20:273-6.
25
Maes A, Verschaeve L, Arroyo A, De Wagter C, Vercruyssen L. In vitro cytogenetic effects of 2450 MHz waves on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 1993;14:495-501.
26
Verschaeve L. Genetic effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005;207:336-41.
27
Smith DW, Clarren SK, Harvey MA. Hyperthermia as a possible teratogenic agent. J Pediatr 1978;92:878-83.
28
Lerman Y, Jacubovich R, Green MS. Pregnancy outcome following exposure to shortwaves among female physiotherapists in Israel. Am J Ind Med 2001;39:499-504.
29
Taskinen H, Kyyrönen P, Hemminki K. Effects of ultrasound, shortwaves, and physical exertion on pregnancy outcome in physiotherapists. J Epidemiol Community Health 1990;44:196-201.
30
Ahlbom A, Green A, Kheifets L, Savitz D, Swerdlow A; ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standing Committee on Epidemiology. Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112:1741-54.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House