Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients: Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Features
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 88-91
August 2016

Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients: Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Features

Turk J Osteoporos 2016;22(2):88-91
1. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty Of Medicine, Department Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, Çanakkale, Turkey
2. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty Of Medicine, Department Of Dermatology, Çanakkale, Turkey
3. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty Of Medicine, Department Of Public Health, Çanakkale, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 03.01.2016
Accepted Date: 19.01.2016
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to perform radiological and clinical determination of the presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis and to evaluate associations with clinical findings.

Materials and Methods:

The medical files of 72 patients with psoriasis presenting to our clinic between years 2009-2014 with a pre-diagnosis of PsA were reviewed retrospectively. Hand, foot and sacroiliac joint radiograms were evaluated by a radiologist who was blinded to the patient’s clinical status and who is experienced on musculoskeletal radiology. Patients with psoriasis were divided into two groups according to the presence of arthritis which was determined based on radiographic findings or on Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. All patients’ demographic characteristics, length of disease, nail involvement, smoking-alcohol consumption were recorded.

Results:

The mean age of all patients was 47.24±14.61 years, and the mean duration of disease was 14.13±11.92 years. Smoking and alcohol consumptions were determined in 54.2% (n=39) and 23.6% (n=17) of the cases, respectively. Nail involvement was determined in 56.9% (n=41) of the cases. PsA was determined based on radiological findings in 58.3% (n=42) of the patients. The mean age and age at onset of disease were higher in PsA (+) patients than in radiologically non-PsA subjects. Based on clinical findings, PsA based on CASPAR criteria was determined in only 18.1% (n=13) of all patients.

Conclusion:

A higher level of PsA was determined using radiological evaluation in this study. The main cause of this condition is the existence of asymptomatic-subclinical patients. A detailed medical history should therefore be taken from patients, and good clinical evaluation is very important. Radiological and clinical evaluation should be performed together in the diagnosis.

Introduction

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease associated with psoriasis in which rheumatoid factor is negative (1). It affects men and women equally, with a prevalence ranging between 0.3-1% (2). In addition to peripheral joint and axial skeleton involvement, osteoarticular findings such as enthesitis, tenosynovitis and dactylitis may also be seen in PsA (3). Joint involvement in PsA ranges from monoarthritis to destructive polyarthritis. Cutaneous lesions are reported to be present before arthritis in 67% of the cases (1). The diagnosis of PsA may be difficult due to the broad clinical spectrum of arthritis, the possibility of earlier cutaneous findings and the absence of recognized specific diagnostic criteria (3,4). It is therefore important to obtain detailed anamnesis from patients with psoriasis and for good clinical evaluation to be performed. That evaluation must investigate established risk factors for arthritis, such as the presence of cutaneous and nail involvement and family history (5).

This study was investigated whether radiographic findings in patients with psoriasis would help predict the identification of patients with PsA. We also intended to determine factors associated with arthritis in patients diagnosed with PsA on the basis of radiological findings.

Materials and Methods

This study was performed as a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients diagnosed with psoriasis in the department of dermatology in our hospital between years 2009-2014 and referred to the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation with a preliminary diagnosis of PsA. Patients’ clinical data and laboratory findings were obtained from medical files and imaging findings from the radiology archive. The present study was conducted with approval of the local Ethics Committee and suitable with Declaration of Helsinki.

Patients’ hand, foot and sacroiliac joint radiographs were evaluated by a radiologist (experienced in musculoskeletal radiology) blinded to their clinical status. In terms of presence of PsA, patients were divided into two groups, those identified by radiology and those identified using Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic data, articular and extra-articular findings and clinical pictures. The relationship between the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) measured by lesion distribution and arthritis was evaluated.

The data obtained were analyzed on SPSS version 19.0 software. Variables’ compatibility with normal distribution was examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Descriptive data were expressed as mean, standard deviation, media, minimum, maximum, frequency and percentage values. In comparisons of patients with or without PsA, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for constant variables and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical variables. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Results

Thirty-six females (50.0%) and 36 males (50.0%) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 47.24±14.61 years (14-85). The mean age at onset of disease was 32.97±16.42 years (5.00-80.00), and the mean length of disease 14.13±11.92 years (1-55). Histories of smoking and alcohol consumption were present in 54.2% (n=39) and 23.6% (n=17).

Nail involvement was present in 56.9% (n=41) of patients with psoriasis, and presence of arthritis, determined clinically and radiologically, was not correlated with nail involvement (p=0.371, p=0.968, respectively). PsA was determined in 58.3% (n=42) of patients based on radiological findings and in 18.1% (n=13) based on CASPAR criteria. The mean age was higher among patients with PsA based on radiological findings. At hand radiography evaluation, radiological changes suggesting PsA were determined in 29.2% (n=21) of patients. In terms of foot radiographs, 41.7% (n=30) were normal, enthesopathy+calcaneal spur was observed in 55.6% (n=40) and radiological changes suggestive of PsA in 2.7% (n=2). Sacroiliac joint involvement was positive in 48.6% (n=35) of patients.

The determination of peripheral arthritis in 6, sacroiliitis in 9 and enthesitis in 11 of the 13 patients diagnosed with PsA on the basis of CASPAR criteria. Nail involvement was observed in 9 cases in this group and uveitis in one. No correlation was determined between the presence of arthritis and PASI scores in patients with PsA diagnosed on the basis of CASPAR criteria (p=0.515).

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with or without PsA according to radiological findings are shown in Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with or without PsA according to CASPAR criteria are shown in Table 2.

Conclusion

PsA is a chronic inflammatory disease reducing the quality of life by causing deformity and joint restriction. Clinical and radiological findings are used to assess joint involvement in the disease (6). Radiological assessment is among the important parameters in PsA and can show changes such as erosion, periosteal reaction, joint space narrowing, lysis, ankylosis and enthesitis (7). Frequent radiographic examination of patients with psoriasis at risk of PsA is not recommended due to the harm of radiation. This is the major cause of limitation for the monitoring of changes in radiographic findings during the development of arthritic changes.

A broad range of 6-42% has been reported for the prevalence of PsA in patients with psoriasis (2). We determined a presence of arthritis in 58.3% (n=42) of cases using radiology and in 18.1% (n=13) on the basis of CASPAR criteria. More than one factor may be involved in the higher determination of presence of PsA at radiological examination. We think that the most important factor increasing radiological diagnosis of PsA is the sacroiliac involvement of 48.6%. Similarly to our findings, high levels of 34-78% have been reported for sacroiliitis demonstrated through radiology (8,9). The high level of detection of sacroiliitis is particularly associated with the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at joint imaging. Studies by Harvie et al. (10) and Maldonado-Cocco et al. (11) detected sacroiliac joint abnormality in 10-25% of patients using conventional radiography. Williamson et al. (12) observed sacroiliac joint involvement using MRI in 26 out of 68 patients with PsA, but reported clinical sacroiliitis in only 10 patients (38%). In a study on 133 patients, Kaçar et al. (13) detected presence of sacroiliitis in 26% (n=34) using radiology. They also reported that 62% of the patients in whom they detected sacroiliitis were clinically asymptomatic (13).

Another radiological finding seen in PsA is peripheral arthritis in various forms, from monoarthritis to polyarthritis. Erosive arthropathy of the distal interphalangeal joints is one important radiological finding (15). Twenty-one of our patients were diagnosed with PsA at hand radiography. We think that the radiological findings in some of these may have been secondary to osteoarthritis. Mean age in our patient group with PsA diagnosed radiologically was 50.05±14.69 years, and the patients being in the advanced age group supports this view.

The level of patients with arthritis detected at foot radiography was low (2.8%), but high levels of enthesopathic changes were determined (55.6%). It has been reported that the rates of enthesitis in the bone attachment areas of tendon, ligament, fascia and articular capsule were 20-25% in patients with psoriasis and 25-53% in patients with PsA (16,17). The most commonly affected areas are the achilles tendon, the plantar fascia, the femoral trochanters, ischial tuberosities, the medial and lateral malleolus, the ulna olecranon and the patella anterior (16,17). Gisondi et al. (18) referred to the presence of subclinical enthesopathy in patients with psoriasis with no clinical findings of arthritis. This may account for the high level of radiologically detected enthesis in our patients.

Another clinical finding seen in patients with psoriasis is nail changes such as pitting, onycholysis and hyperkeratosis. Nail changes are seen in 40% of patients with psoriasis and 80% of patients with PsA, and are regarded as a predictor of development of PsA (19). We identified nail involvement in 56.9% of our patients. However, we determined no correlation between nail involvement and PsA. We think that this derives from the low number of patients.

Asymptomatic-subclinical PsA may be seen in some psoriasis patients with radiological findings. In contrast, false positive results may also be observed due to osteoarthritis developing with age. A detailed medical history should therefore be taken from patients with arthritis, and good clinical evaluation is very important. Delayed diagnosis impairs quality of life by causing joint deformities and restriction.

The main limitation of this study is the insufficient number of patients. Its retrospective nature also limits the clinical factors we were able to analyze. In conclusion, we think that radiological and clinical evaluation should be performed together in the diagnosis and monitoring of PsA, and that diagnosis should be confirmed using imaging techniques.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Medicine Ethical Committe approval was obtained, Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Peer-review: Internal peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: Hatice Reşorlu, Concept: Zerrin Öğretmen, Sevilay Kılıç, Design: Sevilay Kılıç, Ayla Akbal, Data Collection or Processing: Coşkun Zateri, Sibel Cevizci, Analysis or Interpretation: Coşkun Zateri, Sibel Cevizci, Literature Search: Zerrin Öğretmen, Ayla Akbal, Writing: Hatice Reşorlu, Sevilay Kılıç.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.